• kth.se
  • Student web
  • Intranet
  • kth.se
  • Student web
  • Intranet
Login
FMF3032/MF240V HT22
Part 1, Project
Skip to content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • Min översikt
  • FMF3032/MF240V HT22
  • Assignments
  • Part 1, Project
  • Home
  • Assignments
  • Modules
  • Course Evaluation

Part 1, Project

  • Due 30 Sep 2022 by 18:00
  • Points 1
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload

The second assignment for Part 1 involves selecting a case study (collaboratively) for your group, reading up on it, working on it and preparing a presentation 

Please see below for suggested case studies. Notify the course coordinator about a few case studies you (and your group) are interested in. We need this information to coordinate among the groups such that different case studies are selected (for the benefits of all).

The assignment corresponds to

  1. Selecting a common case study per group (after synchronizing with the course part coordinator)
  2. Preparing a PRESENTATION for the main session for the first part of the course (i.e., the first workshop, see here) - and completing this during the remainder of module 1. See here for a suggested outline, containing both collaborative and individual parts:
    1. The case study (2 slides, short description of the case, with references) (JOINT WORK)
    2. Reflections from the group! How does this case study relate to safety and security? What risks, hazards and threats can you identify? (JOINT WORK in the group!) (2–3 slides) We recommend to use (a selection, a subset) of the following cards to guide you: http://securitycards.cs.washington.edu/assets/security-cards-deck-with-croplines.pdf Links to an external site.
    3. Assessment of the case study considering Chapter 2 of Rasmussen and Svedung. What risks do you see that go beyond the technical systems? (~ 3 slides) How would actual attacks and accidents affect the upper levels? How could the upper levels "control" or limit such attacks and accidents? (JOINT WORK in the group!)
    4. Assessment of the case study considering your individual additional reading, with a subsection contributed by each group member (Individual contributions)! (INDIVIDUALLY - 2 slides)
    5. Concluding remarks including key topics you found interesting, unclear, and where you would like to dig deeper! (JOINT WORK!)! (1 slide)
  3. Case study selection guidelines: You are free to suggest any relevant safety and security related case study (just let us know which)! To assist you, see here interesting examples for your consideration:
      • Boeing 737 Max: http://safety.addalot.se/2019/program Links to an external site. ==> see workshop 1 on that web page!
      • Ariane V—http://sunnyday.mit.edu/nasa-class/Ariane5-report.html Links to an external site. and https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/589224 Links to an external site. (Ariane 5, whodunit)
      • Ukraine power grid blackout: https://www.zdnet.com/article/industroyer-an-in-depth-look-at-the-culprit-behind-ukraines-power-grid-blackout/ Links to an external site.
      • Stuxnet—see, e.g., https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323199431_Stuxnet Links to an external site.
      • Intelligent transportation systems (ITS)—e.g., https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/948835 Links to an external site. (6 pages), https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-28183-4_1 Links to an external site. (17 pages) (and for more: https://www.jsce-int.org/system/files/ITS_Introduction_Guide_2.pdf Links to an external site.)  - For this case with ITS - we suggest that you consider future visions for ITS rather than the limited systems available today.
      • Further case study examples from Part III in the Handbook of system safety and security (edited by Edward Griffor)
1664553600 09/30/2022 06:00pm
Please include a description
Additional comments:
Rating max score to > Pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

Find rubric
Please include a title
Find a rubric
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 Pts Full marks blank
0 to >0 Pts No marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional comments
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 Pts Full marks blank
0 to >0 Pts No marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional comments
Total points: 5 out of 5
Previous
Next
Part 1, TheoryNext Module:
Part 2: The system engineering perspective