• kth.se
  • Student web
  • Intranet
  • kth.se
  • Student web
  • Intranet
Login
Degree Projects at EECS, 2024
Opposition
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • Min översikt
  • Degree Projects at EECS, 2024
  • Assignments
  • Opposition
  • Home
  • Modules
  • Assignments
  • Syllabus

Opposition

  • Due No Due Date
  • Points 0
  • Submitting a file upload

This is a mandatory assignment required for passing the course. The student should arrange to be the opponent at the public discussion of another student presenting a second-cycle degree project. 

The student shall prepare a written review ("opposition report") of the thesis report, and carry out an oral public discussion at the other student's presentation. The opposition report shall be uploaded in Canvas before the presentation. After the presentation the student should send the opposition report and eventual other comments to the opposed student.

The opposition will be assessed by the examiner of the presenting student.

The aim of the opposition report is two-fold: 
As an opponent, you should demonstrate that you fulfill the learning outcome that you are able to "reflect on and critically review [...] others' scientific achievements".
For the presenter, it is an opportunity to demonstrate their ability to address constructive criticism by considering opponent feedback when preparing the final version of the thesis.
This means that the opposition should focus on suggesting, in relative detail, improvements that would improve the thesis, as well as both identifying its strengths and weaknesses.

Students can sign up to be opponents here: Opposition sign up and announcing the presentation

Template for the opposition report is available here: Manage the ongoing project 

 

Requirements for pass:

Written opposition: 

The opposition protocol is clearly and fully completed. The respondent's report has been assessed critically, with strengths and weaknesses identified. Relevant and constructive suggestions for improvement have been given. 

Oral opposition:

Questions and comments enabled the respondent to explain ambiguities and further develop the reasoning in the report, by opening up for in-depth answers.

 

0
Please include a description
Additional Comments:
Rating max score to > pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Find a Rubric
Find Rubric
Please include a title
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit rating Delete rating
0 to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit rating Delete rating
5 to >0 pts
Full Marks
blank
Edit rating Delete rating
0 to >0 pts
No Marks
blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 5 out of 5
Previous
Next
Opposition sign up and announcing the presentation Thesis draft for presentation - optional