PPPPevaluate!

1. Choose a generative AI system, such as

• https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/ Links to an external site.
• https://folkrnn.org/ Links to an external site.
• https://huggingface.co/spaces/stabilityai/stable-diffusion Links to an external site.
• https://openai.com/dall-e-2/ Links to an external site.
• or many others here https://library.phygital.plus/usecases Links to an external site. and https://itch.io/c/235488/cool-tools Links to an external site.

2. Add the system to the spreadsheet: https://kth-my.sharepoint.com/:x:/r/personal/holzap_ug_kth_se/_layouts/15/doc2.aspx?sourcedoc=%7B089269b0-4027-4f6c-8c26-2d9e6c616a83%7D&action=edit&activeCell=%27Blad1%27!G9&wdinitialsession=650ceea7-560d-476a-b269-58c960ae8c4e&wdrldsc=7&wdrldc=1&wdrldr=AccessTokenExpiredWarning%2CRefreshingExpiredAccessT Links to an external site.

3. Evaluate the computational creativity of the system from at least two of the four PPPPerspectives:

• Person/Producer
• Process
• Product
• Press

(as mentioned by Lamb et al (2018), not all evaluation methods fit exclusively into one of the above. In such a case chose two somewhat diverging methods.)

4. Write up a meaningful description of your evaluation, which motivates your choice of evaluation method and critically reflects on the evaluation process. For further information, see: 
@article{Lamb2018a,
    author = {C. Lamb and D. G. Brown and C. L. A. Clarke},
    journal = {ACM Computing Surveys},
    number = {2},
    pages = {1--34},
    title = {Evaluating Computational Creativity: An Interdisciplinary Tutorial},
    volume = {51},
    year = {2018}}

@article{Jordanous2016g,
    author = {A. Jordanous},
    journal = {Connection Science},
    number = {2},
    pages = {194--216},
    title = {Four PPPPerspectives on computational creativity in theory and in practice},
    volume = {28},
    year = {2016}}

5. Come to the session 3 prepared to present your results!