Assignment 1: ILOs and draft of new grading criteria
- Due 17 Apr 2023 by 19:00
- Points 0
- Submitting a file upload
- File types pdf
- Available until 16 May 2023 at 18:00
Write down concise answers to all questions below in your submission. You are welcome to present answers using matrices and lists in a similar way as in Viggo's example. The report should be in pdf and will be peer-reviewed before next course meeting.
-
Do the ILOs need to be modified? How?
-
Does any ILO need to be broken down? How?
-
For each ILO: how is it assessed?
-
Look through your current assessments in the course. What is expected today from a student to receive a high grade?
-
For each ILO: should it be assessed to just E level or several levels?
-
For each ILO that should be assessed to several levels: should difficulty or grade of execution (or both) distinguish the levels?
-
For each ILO: how should E level criteria be formulated?
-
For each ILO that should be assessed to several levels: how should the highest level grading criteria be formulated?
-
Start planning how the grading criteria should be used in the assessment tasks. May several ILOs be assessed in the same assessment? Will it take several assessments to assess some ILO? Will different assessments/assignments be required for assessing different levels?
The submission should be made in Canvas no later than 17 April at 19:00. Make sure you are logged in both at KTH.SE and in Canvas (click on the key symbol at the top left of Canvas) before going to try to submit. Submit your submission as a PDF document. The submission will be peer reviewed before the second meeting of the course. Therefore, please start the submission with data about your course that will make it easier for the peer reviewer: enter course code, course name, number of credits and number of students. Also enter your name.
You must review two other submissions in Canvas by 20 April at 19:00. You will find the submissions that you should review in Canvas before 18 April at 8:00. Make sure you are logged in both at KTH.SE and in Canvas (click on the key symbol at the top left of Canvas). For each of the submissions, you must answer the eight questions in the assessment matrix. Click Show Rubric (Visa Matris) at the top right to open the assessment matrix.
Link to more information about Canvas peer reviews. In this information, please read the sections Open Assigned Peer Review, View Peer Review, and Complete Rubric.
Rubric
Find rubric| Criteria | Ratings | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Review the ILOs. Are the ILOs expressed from the student's point of view (after passing the course, the student should be able to... or similar)?
|
|||
|
Are the verbs used in the ILOs active and assessable (i.e., are expressions such as understand, have knowledge about, know about etc. avoided)?
|
|||
|
Do the ILOs seem to be at a suitable level of difficulty? And are they phrased in an understandable way?
|
|||
|
For each ILO, is there a description for how it is assessed? Do the forms of assessment seem to be reasonable, for each ILO?
|
|||
|
Are the grading criteria clearly aligned to the intended learning outcomes?
|
|||
|
Do you think it will be possible to assess the performance of the students using the grading criteria and to use the grading criteria to motivate a student's grading?
|
|||
|
Is it difficulty or grade of execution that differ between the different levels (of ILOs that have grading criteria on more than one level)?
|
|||
|
Other constructive feedback.
|
|||
|
|
|||
