Assignment peer-review Activity recognition

The table at the bottom of this page shows which groups should meet which group to present their work.

1. Agree on a time to meet and how
2. Send the other group the material you handed in before the meeting
3. Meet and present your work
4. Upload a short review of the other's group work here

The result of this should be a document from each reviewer group which should show that you can describe how the other group solved the problem (ie describe roughly their approach), document your results from using their code and so on. See a template below.

Peer-review template

• "Code" your group (e.g. LiU2)
• "Code" of the other group (e.g. KTH5)
• Who from you group was present? If not all, why? We expect all to be present.
• Was the problem well presented ?
• Was the problem solved ?
• Was the methodology well documented ? 
  • Summarize the method
• Was the code working? (Put a cap of 1h to try to get it to run)
  • Run with your data. Do you get the same results?
• Strengths and weaknesses ?
  • Motivate with one or two sentences
• Do you propose “Pass” or “Needs to be improved” ?
  • If not pass, then you need to provide a motivation and be clear on what should be improved. 
  • Be constructive, helpful and friendly.
  • We make the final decisions about pass or not.

Group matching

Group A reviews Group B and vice versa. In The case with three groups, Group A reviews Group B, Group B reviews Group C and Group C reviews Group A. All three groups present together in case of threes groups.