• kth.se
  • Student web
  • Intranet
  • kth.se
  • Student web
  • Intranet
Login
FEM3200 HT22 (50820)
Grading HW#6
Skip to content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • Min översikt
  • FEM3200 HT22 (50820)
  • Assignments
  • Grading HW#6
  • Home
  • Modules
  • Course Evaluation

Grading HW#6

  • Due 19 Oct 2022 by 12:00
  • Points 1
  • Submitting a file upload
  • File types zip
  • Available after 12 Oct 2022 at 12:00

This is a group task! Your grading group is also available as a group in Canvas. 

All of you should contribute to the grading every week. At least two students in the grading group should contribute to the grading of each problem. For each graded problem, it should be clearly stated which two (or more students) are responsible for the grading.

Mark partial results, and provide informative and constructive comments/feedback, of the form that you would like to see on your own graded solutions.

If you, after thorough discussions within the grading group, are still uncertain about how to grade a solution or even uncertain on what the correct solution is, please contact Mats.

When all assigned HW submissions have been graded, one person in the group submits a zip-file with all graded reports. Please sum up the total score and write it on the top of the first page.

Grading Scale

The full weekly homework (not the individual problems) is graded by 1-3 points for the technical/mathematical content and 1-2 points for the presentation, according to the following principles.

Technical/mathematical content, 1-3 points:

  • 1 point: More than 50% of the difficulties have been solved,
    at least by providing a valid approach and working
    out some details.
  • 2 point: More than 75% of the difficulties have been solved,
    at least by providing a valid approach and working
    out some details. In addition, at least two of the
    problems have been solved fully.
  • 3 point: Full solutions are provided for all problems and only
    minor details are flawed/missing.

Presentation, 1-2 points:

(only judged if at least 1 point was
obtained for the technical content, and only judged for
the problems or parts of the project that have been
“solved” according to above).

  • 1 point: The presentation manages to convey the main
    ideas of the solved problems, but not fully
    convincing in all details.
  • 2 point: Clear and convincing presentation of the solved
    problems.
1666173600 10/19/2022 12:00pm
Please include a description
Additional comments:
Rating max score to > Pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

Find rubric
Please include a title
Find a rubric
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 Pts Full marks blank
0 to >0 Pts No marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional comments
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 Pts Full marks blank
0 to >0 Pts No marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional comments
Total points: 5 out of 5
Previous
Next
Grading HW#5 Grading HW#7