Rubric

Keep in mind that 33 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Presentation
Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome explain and use basic terminology in the area correctly,
Clear, concise, and correct.
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts Excellent
4 Pts Very well done
3 Pts Well done
2 Pts Adequate
0 Pts Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome present and explain their reasoning to others
Clear, concise, logical, with appropriate level of abstraction, substantiated.
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts Excellent
4 Pts Very well done
3 Pts Well done
2 Pts Adequate
0 Pts Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome analyse descriptions of PET systems with regard to their protection of privacy and function
whenever applicable: identify vulnerabilities from PET system descriptions, predict their equivalent threat, and choose countermeasures against identified threats and show their efficiency, compare countermeasures and evaluate their side effects.  
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts Excellent
4 Pts Very well done
3 Pts Well done
2 Pts Adequate
0 Pts Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome find and use documentation of privacy-related problems and technologies
Relevant, well-written, well-reasoned, with appropriate level of abstraction, timely (early if influential, otherwise not outdated), peer-reviewed, scientific, number of papers published at respectable venues. If appropriate, news, opinion, popular-science resources for motivation.
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts Excellent
4 Pts Very well done
3 Pts Well done
2 Pts Adequate
0 Pts Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
design presentation material
threshold: pts
5 Pts Full Marks
0 Pts No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
keep within time range, proportional to group size
threshold: pts
5 Pts Full Marks
0 Pts No Marks
pts
5 pts
--