Rubric

Find rubric
Keep in mind that 33 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Report
Report
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome explain and use basic terminology in the area correctly,
Clear, concise, and correct.
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts
Excellent
4 Pts
Very well done
3 Pts
Well done
2 Pts
Adequate
0 Pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome find and use documentation of privacy-related problems and technologies
Relevant, well-written, well-reasoned, with appropriate level of abstraction, timely (early if influential, otherwise not outdated), peer-reviewed, scientific, number of papers published at respectable venues. If appropriate, news, opinion, popular-science resources for motivation.
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts
Excellent
4 Pts
Very well done
3 Pts
Well done
2 Pts
Adequate
0 Pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome analyse descriptions of PET systems with regard to their protection of privacy and function
whenever applicable: identify vulnerabilities from PET system descriptions, predict their equivalent threat, and choose countermeasures against identified threats and show their efficiency, compare countermeasures and evaluate their side effects.  
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts
Excellent
4 Pts
Very well done
3 Pts
Well done
2 Pts
Adequate
0 Pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome demonstrate an overview of privacy enhancing technologies (PET)
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 Pts
Exceeds Expectations
3 Pts
Meets Expectations
0 Pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome identify threats against privacy in an IT system
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 Pts
Exceeds Expectations
3 Pts
Meets Expectations
0 Pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a learning outcome present and explain their reasoning to others
Clear, concise, logical, with appropriate level of abstraction, substantiated.
threshold: 2.0 pts
5 Pts
Excellent
4 Pts
Very well done
3 Pts
Well done
2 Pts
Adequate
0 Pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
pts
5 pts
--
follow format instructions
threshold: pts
5 Pts
Full Marks
0 Pts
No Marks
pts
5 pts
--
Total points: 35 out of 35