Essay

Essay information 2021 - new

Graded essay

The goal of this essay is to give you training in scientific writing and an opportunity to think through how the course content can be applied in a degree project. You will practice writing primarily in a scientific style, but also in a popular science style. Your work will be based on a Bachelor’s Thesis in Computer Science.

Your essay should begin with an accessible summary of the thesis intended for a layperson who probably has no deep knowledge of computer science. Give a brief popular explanation of what the thesis is about and a discussion of its interest to the general public. (1 page maximum).

Next comes a section with general scientific considerations in connection with the thesis. This may include historical references, philosophical terms such as anti-realism or the HD-method, statistical concepts such as correlation or null hypothesis, CS themes such as P vs NP, a discussion of ethical issues related to the thesis topic, an analysis of the arguments in the thesis, a discussion of the reproducibility of the work as published in the thesis, etc. (2 pages recommended length).

Try to make as much use of the course content as possible while staying relevant to the topic. Several different perspectives should be considered. Remember to refer to all sources of information used in a correct and complete way. You can choose any commonly used convention for references, but this needs to be followed consistently. This section should be written in an academic style

In the final (third) section, you should give suggestions for how the work could be improved to satisfy the requirements of a Masters' thesis.  Focus on the content rather than minor language details, though you may also make suggestions related to the presentation. Since the Bachelor's thesis was written a couple of years ago it is very likely that there is new research in the area. Find several relevant newer references in addition to those cited in the Bachelor's thesis, and explain how these connect to the thesis work and how it could be improved or extended (older references that are not included in the thesis may also be considered). (2 pages recommended length).

KTH guidelines for master's theses can be found here, and an informal Swedish translation here.

Formal requirements

  • Title page with your name, and the name of the Bachelor's Thesis under scrutiny.
  • Part 1 (Summary). Maximum 1 page.
  • Part 2 (Scientific considerations). Recommended length 2 pages.
  • Part 3 (Suggestions). Recommended length 2 pages.
  • List of references
  • Font size 10pt
  • Your essay must be checked with spell checking and grammar checking tools (e.g. Grammarly) before submission, and carefully proofread manually after that. Your reference list should be checked so that all references are correct and complete. The essay will be checked for plagiarism - text by others can only be used in the form of explicit quotes with a source.
  • You will be asked to review the essays of two other students. A draft of your own essay must be submitted for peer review.
  • LaTeX submissions are encouraged; the submission should be a pdf file.

 

Dates

  • December 10,  2021  -  January 5, 2022 Peer review in Peergrade
    • You may hand in the preliminary version of your essay in Peergrade for peer review at any time between these dates. This will be a Live Session so if you hand in earlier, you will receive earlier feedback. 
  • January 7, 2022, 17:00. Final version due in Canvas
    • Deadline for submitting the final version of your essay (after review)  in Canvas.

 

Grading

Your essay will be graded according to the following criteria:

  • A late essay will not get a higher grade than E.
  • An essay that does not fulfill all pass criteria will receive Fx (and should be revised and handed in again).
  • An essay that in addition to the pass criteria also fulfills some of the "pass with distinction" criteria will get a higher grade than E.

Pass: 

  • The essay fulfills the formal requirements,
  • The essay is easy to read and understand, and the language is of acceptable quality.
  • The student has summarized the thesis in an appropriate way
  • The student has written about different scientific considerations in connection with the thesis subject,
    and shows an ability to connect to the course content.
  • The student has identified areas that need improvement, and given consideration both to the presentation and
    the scientific content.
  • All sources are properly referenced, with references given correctly. 

Pass with distinction:

  • The style is well adapted to the target audience for each of the three sections. 
  • The language of the essay is up to the standard expected for submission of scientific articles to an international journal,
    i.e., correct and reasonably idiomatic.
  • The summary generates interest and can be understood by a layperson.
  • The general scientific considerations are clearly connected to the thesis and show a broad knowledge of the
    course content, both with regard to the theory of science and to research methodology.
  • The author gives constructive and insightful suggestions for improvement and development of the thesis, and cites
    multiple relevant references connected to the thesis topic.

More details on grading policies may be added later.

Essay subjects (Bachelor's theses)

Please choose your subject in this doodle (will open Thursday Dec 2, 2021)Links to theses are given  below.

This is a hidden poll, so remember to write down the number and name of the subject you choose. If you have signed up for a subject then you may start working on it.

Once a subject is fully booked it will no longer be available in the doodle.

Theses to be used as essay subjects (preliminary):

1. A comparison of algorithms used in traffic control systems Links to an external site.

2. Evacuation with Obstacles in RealTime using Crowd Simulation Links to an external site.

3. Optimization of American option pricing through GPU computing Links to an external site.

4. Detecting hate speech on Twitter A comparative study on the naive Bayes classifier Links to an external site.

5. Improving path planning of autonomous vacuum cleaners using obstacle classification Links to an external site.

6. Using Layer-wise Relevance Propagation and Sensitivity Analysis Heatmaps to understand the Classification of an Image produced by a Neural Network Links to an external site.

7. Unsupervised anomaly detection in time series with recurrent neural networks Links to an external site.

9. When Comments and Code Diverge Investigating the Consequences of Bad Comments Links to an external site.

10. Analysing Social Media Marketing on Twitter using Sentiment Analysis Links to an external site.

11. Augmented Reality Navigation Interfaces Designed for People with Mild Dementia Links to an external site.

12. Generalisation in brain-computer interface classification Links to an external site.

13. Decyphering the Geheimschreiber, a Machine Learning approach Recreating and breaking the Siemens and Halske T52 used during World War II to secure communications in Sweden Links to an external site.

14. Simulated evolution of food foraging strategies of army ants Links to an external site.

15. Performance vs. Output Quality in Subdivision Surfaces Links to an external site.

 

Resources