Assignment 1: ILOs and draft of new grading criteria
- Inlämningsdatum 17 apr 2020 av 19:00
- Poäng 0
- Lämnar in ett externt verktyg
- Tillgänglig till 30 maj 2020 kl 23.59
Write down concise answers to all questions below in your submission. You are welcome to present answers using matrices and lists in a similar way as in Viggo's example. The report should be in pdf and will be peer-reviewed before next course meeting.
-
Do the ILOs need to be modified?
-
Does any ILO need to be broken down?
-
For each ILO: how is it assessed?
-
Look through your current assessments in the course. Which qualities and difficulties would you expect that a student getting a high grade should fulfill?
-
For each ILO: should it be assessed to just E level or several levels?
-
For each ILO that should be assessed to several levels: should difficulty or grade of execution (or both) distinguish the levels?
-
For each ILO: how should E level criteria be formulated?
-
For each ILO that should be assessed to several levels: how should the highest level grading criteria be formulated?
-
Start planning how the grading criteria should be used in the assessment tasks.
The submission will be made in Peergrade no later than 17 April at 19:00. Make sure you are logged in both at KTH.SE and in Canvas (click on the key symbol at the top left of Canvas) before going to Peergrade by clicking the link at the end of the page. Submit your submission as a PDF document. The submission will be peer reviewed before the second meeting of the course. Therefore, start the submission with data about your course that will make it easier at peer review: enter course code, course name, number of points and number of students. Also enter your name.
You must review two other submissions in Peergrade by 22 April at 19:00. You will see and review one submission at a time. When you have received a peer review yourself, give feedback on the review. It doesn't have to be a text - a click is enough.