Experiment 1: As numbers - near median
seconds | frequency | Cumulative % | |
---|---|---|---|
0.019995 | 687 | 9.92% | |
0.019996 | 895 | 10.75% | |
0.019997 | 1334 | 11.99% | |
0.019998 | 209 | 12.18% | |
Mean | 0.019999 | 1898 | 13.95% |
0.020000 | 2671 | 16.44% | |
0.020001 | 3403 | 19.60% | |
0.020002 | 4747 | 24.02% | |
0.020003 | 7742 | 31.22% | |
Median | 0.020004 | 13059 | 43.37% |
Mode | 0.020005 | 17121 | 59.30% |
0.020006 | 13630 | 71.98% | |
0.020007 | 8211 | 79.62% | |
0.020008 | 5404 | 84.64% | |
0.020009 | 570 | 85.18% | |
0.020010 | 3158 | 88.11% | |
0.020011 | 2305 | 90.26% | |
0.020012 | 1787 | 91.92% | |
0.020013 | 1262 | 93.09% | |
0.020014 | 886 | 93.92% |
Transcript
And if we look at our statistics data of those frequencies for those bins. We see that the median is down here at 20.004 milliseconds that was the frequency. 43.37% of the data was in the same bin as the median The mode (the most commonly occurring value) was just a little bit longer - one microsecond longer and that was 59.30% of the data. But if we look at the mean, we see that the mean is way down here at 0.019999 seconds (sorry) 19.999 milliseconds, But that represented only 13.95% of the data. So we see that there's a pretty big issue here - the data isn't arriving at the twenty-millisecond separation, so I think some are arriving a little sooner and some are arriving a little later - shifting our median value out just slightly. So half the data takes longer than this half the data takes less.